Back
No items found.

7 Steps to Improving Resumes for Proposals That Win

Your proposal's technical approach might be flawless, but evaluators often make scoring decisions based on the personnel section first. When resumes don't clearly demonstrate relevant experience, you lose points before anyone reads your methodology.

This guide walks through seven steps to transform scattered employee data into proposal-ready resumes that align with evaluation criteria and help your team win more bids.

What Is an RFP Resume and Why Does It Matter

To improve resumes for proposals, tailor each one to the specific Request for Proposal by pulling keywords directly from the evaluation criteria, quantifying achievements with real numbers, and leading with project experience that matches the scope of work. A clean format with consistent headings and strong action verbs helps evaluators find what they're looking for quickly. The goal is to connect each team member's background to the proposal's success factors—not just summarize their career.

An RFP resume (sometimes called a proposal resume or bid CV) is a document you submit as part of a competitive proposal to prove your team can deliver the work. Unlike a job-seeking resume, which sells an individual to a hiring manager, a proposal resume sells your team's collective capability to a specific client for a specific project.

Where it fits in your proposal process: Early planning and team selection, then refined during active proposal development.

Step 1: Understand What Makes Proposal Resumes Different

Before jumping into tactics, it helps to understand why proposal resumes require a different approach than the resumes most people know.

How Proposal Resumes Differ From Job-Seeking Resumes

A job-seeking resume is designed to get someone hired. A proposal resume is designed to help your firm win work, especially in consulting and professional services. That distinction changes how you write, structure, and present the content.

  • Purpose: Demonstrate project-specific qualifications rather than seek employment
  • Audience: Evaluators scoring against defined criteria rather than hiring managers scanning for fit
  • Content focus: Relevant projects and measurable outcomes rather than job duties or career progression

Why Evaluators Score Personnel Sections

Many RFPs assign specific point values to personnel qualifications—sometimes 20% or more of the total score. Evaluators look for concrete proof that your proposed staff have the skills and experience to perform the work successfully.

Weak resumes can cost you points and lose the bid, even when your technical solution is strong. You might have the best approach in the competition, but if your team's qualifications aren't clearly demonstrated, evaluators have no choice but to score you lower.

When to Customize Versus Reuse Resume Content

A master resume serves as the comprehensive source of content, but each submission requires tailoring. The personal statement and project selection typically change for every bid. Other elements—like education and certifications—can often stay consistent across submissions.

The key is knowing which sections to adapt and which to leave alone. Tailoring everything wastes time. Tailoring nothing loses bids.

Step 2: Build a Comprehensive Master Resume

A master resume is a complete, detailed document that serves as the single source of truth for all tailored versions you create. This step is about capturing everything in one place. Filtering and tailoring come later.

Where it fits in your proposal process: Ongoing employee data management, before any specific RFP is released.

Write a Compelling Personal Statement

This brief summary—typically 50 to 75 words—captures an individual's qualifications and the value they bring. Write it in third person for a professional proposal tone.

Keep the statement adaptable, since this section gets tailored most often. Think of it as the hook that tells evaluators why this person belongs on the team.

Document Project Experience and Achievements

Capture all relevant projects, including client names (where permitted), the individual's role, the project scope, and the outcomes. Use strong action verbs and focus on contributions and achievements rather than participation.

This section becomes the library of experience you'll pull from for every proposal. The more comprehensive your master content, the faster you can tailor for specific opportunities.

List Relevant Skills and Certifications

Include all technical competencies, software proficiencies, and industry certifications. Organize them by category to make scanning easy for evaluators.

Keep this list current. Expired certifications can raise questions about data accuracy, and missing current ones can cost you points.

Include Education and Professional Development

List all degrees, relevant coursework, and ongoing training. Including professional development activities demonstrates a commitment to staying current in the field, which evaluators often view favorably.

Summarize Employment History

Provide employer names, job titles, and dates of employment. Keep descriptions brief in the master resume.

In proposals, detailed project experience carries far more weight than general job descriptions. Employment history provides context, but projects prove capability.

Step 3: Structure Your Resume for Evaluator Readability

Structure directly affects scoring. Evaluators review many resumes quickly, so clear organization helps them find the information they're looking for.

Lead With the Most Relevant Information

Place the personal statement and most relevant project experience at the top. Don't bury key qualifications below less important details.

Always consider what the evaluator is looking for first, then make that information easy to find. If the RFP emphasizes healthcare experience, healthcare projects go at the top.

Use Clear Headings and Consistent Formatting

Standardize section titles across all team resumes in a proposal. Common headings include "Relevant Project Experience," "Education," and "Certifications."

Use consistent fonts, spacing, and heading styles throughout. Inconsistency suggests a disorganized team—even if that's not the reality.

Respect Page Limits While Maximizing Impact

Many RFPs specify strict resume page limits. When space is constrained, prioritize content by relevance rather than recency.

Cut older or less relevant projects first to stay within the limit while keeping your strongest qualifications visible. A two-page resume packed with relevant experience beats a four-page resume padded with filler.

Step 4: Write Compelling Content That Wins

This step moves from structure to substance. The focus here is on writing techniques that make your content persuasive to evaluators.

Choose the Right Tone for Proposal Writing

Proposal resumes use a professional tone and are written in third person. Avoid first person ("I managed...") or overly casual language.

The goal is confident and factual—not boastful, not modest. Let the accomplishments speak for themselves.

Quantify Results and Demonstrate Value

Use specific outcomes instead of vague claims. Evaluators respond to concrete details they can verify.

VagueSpecific"Extensive experience in infrastructure projects""Led structural engineering for a municipal water treatment facility serving 250,000 residents, delivering the project 10% under budget""Managed large teams""Directed a cross-functional team of 12 engineers across three project phases"

Numbers give evaluators something to hold onto. "Large" means different things to different people. "12 engineers" is clear.

Proofread and Get Employee Approval

Errors undermine credibility. A typo in a resume suggests carelessness—and evaluators may wonder where else that carelessness shows up.

Implement a review process that includes having employees verify the accuracy of their own resumes. They know their experience best, and their approval protects against misrepresentation.

Step 5: Tailor Resumes to Specific RFP Requirements

This is where real improvement happens—transforming master content into a winning submission. Tailoring isn't optional if you want to submit competitive bids.

Where it fits in your proposal process: After the RFP is released, during active proposal development.

Align Content With Evaluation Criteria

Map each resume directly to the evaluation factors stated in the RFP. If the solicitation emphasizes specific experience types (for example, "experience with federal agencies"), lead with projects demonstrating that experience.

Mirror the RFP's language wherever possible. If evaluators are looking for "stakeholder engagement," use that phrase rather than "client communication."

Customize the Personal Statement for Each Opportunity

Rewrite the summary to emphasize qualifications most relevant to the specific project. Reference the opportunity type or client's industry when appropriate.

This signals that you've done your homework—not just recycled boilerplate. Evaluators can tell the difference.

Select and Prioritize Relevant Project Experience

From the master resume, choose only projects that best demonstrate capability to perform the required work. Reorder or expand descriptions based on the RFP's priorities.

Remove or minimize projects that don't directly support the bid. Every line of text competes for the evaluator's attention, so make each one count.

Step 6: Format and Package Resumes for Submission

Final preparation steps happen before you submit. Simple formatting errors or missing elements can disqualify an otherwise strong proposal.

Match Required Templates and Layouts

Some RFPs—particularly in the public sector—mandate specific formats, especially for federal and government contracting submissions. The SF 330, for example, is required for federal architecture and engineering work. Non-compliance can result in immediate rejection.

Always check formatting requirements first. Then check them again before submission.

Include Professional Headshots When Requested

Some proposals require or benefit from professional photos. If you include them, ensure consistent quality across all team members.

Verify that including photos doesn't violate any RFP instructions. Some solicitations explicitly prohibit them.

Ensure Visual Consistency Across Team Resumes

All resumes in a single submission look like they belong together when you use the same template, fonts, and formatting conventions for every team member.

Visual consistency reinforces the impression of a cohesive, professional team. Mismatched formatting does the opposite.

Common Mistakes That Hurt Proposal Resume Scores

Avoiding common pitfalls can save you points—and contracts.

Using Generic Content Across All Proposals

Evaluators recognize boilerplate content. Submitting generic, untailored resumes suggests your team didn't take the opportunity seriously.

Even when time is short, some tailoring is better than none. A customized personal statement and reordered project list take 15 minutes and can make the difference between winning and losing.

Burying Relevant Experience Below Less Important Details

Avoid strictly chronological ordering if it hides the most relevant work. Lead with what matters most to this specific evaluator rather than what happened most recently.

A project from five years ago might be more relevant than last month's work. Put it where evaluators will see it.

Ignoring RFP-Specific Formatting Requirements

Non-compliance with formatting rules risks disqualification. Page limits, required sections, and template requirements exist for a reason—follow them precisely.

"Close enough" doesn't count. If the RFP says two pages, two pages means two pages.

Step 7: Centralize Resume Management for Faster Turnaround

This step addresses the operational challenge of improving resumes at scale. Centralization enables all the previous steps, allowing your team to work efficiently under deadline pressure.

Where it fits in your proposal process: Foundational infrastructure that supports all proposal activities.

Store Resumes in a Searchable Central Platform

Scattered files on shared drives and endless email attachments create chaos. A central system solves this by letting proposal teams find the right people and project experience quickly.

Platforms like Flowcase provide this searchability, turning resume data into a strategic asset rather than a scavenger hunt. When an RFP drops, you can find the right team members in minutes instead of hours.

Keep Employee Data Current and Accurate

Outdated resumes slow down the proposal process and risk submitting incorrect information. Establishing a process for regular updates prevents last-minute scrambles.

Centralized systems can automatically prompt employees to maintain their profiles, reducing the burden on proposal teams. The result is fresher data with less chasing, with mature response management functions generating 34% more revenue than those without.

Integrate With Your CRM or ERP

Connecting resume data with existing business systems reduces duplicate data entry and keeps information synchronized. When someone updates their profile in one place, the change flows through.

Flowcase offers integrations and REST API support to make this connection seamless with your existing infrastructure.

Leverage AI Tools for Translation and Proofreading

AI-powered features help with multilingual proposals and catch errors before submission. Translation, proofreading, and shortening text to meet page limits are tasks that otherwise consume hours of manual effort.

Flowcase's AI tools handle these tasks within the platform, so you're not copying and pasting between systems.

Start Winning More Proposals With Proposal-Ready Resumes

Improving resumes for proposals isn't about working harder—it's about building systems that make quality and speed sustainable.

  • Master resumes provide the foundation for every tailored submission
  • Tailoring wins bids by connecting your team's experience to the evaluator's criteria
  • Structure and formatting matter as much as content because evaluators scan quickly
  • Centralized management eliminates the manual effort that slows teams down

The firms that win consistently aren't necessarily the ones with the best technical solutions. They're the ones who can demonstrate their qualifications clearly, quickly, and compellingly—every time, with leaders achieving 58% win rates versus 50% for laggards.

👉 Get your Proposal Optimization Score →

FAQs About Improving Resumes for Proposals

How long should a resume be for an RFP response?

Most proposal resumes range from one to two pages, though the ideal length depends on the RFP's requirements. Always defer to any page limit specified in the solicitation—exceeding it can result in disqualification or lost points.

Should the employee or the proposal team write the resume for a bid?

A collaborative approach works best. Employees provide source content for their master resume, and proposal professionals tailor it for each specific submission. This division of labor ensures accuracy while maintaining consistency across the proposal.

How often should employees update their master resumes?

Employees benefit from updating their master resumes after completing significant projects or earning new certifications. At minimum, all resumes deserve an annual review and refresh to ensure accuracy.

Can the same project examples be used in multiple proposal submissions?

Yes, using the same project examples across multiple proposals is common and acceptable. However, project descriptions benefit from tailoring to emphasize aspects most relevant to each specific RFP's evaluation criteria.

How should proposal teams handle resumes for staff members with limited relevant experience?

For staff with limited relevant experience, focus on transferable skills, relevant training, and supporting roles on related projects. Honesty about experience level matters, but you can still highlight potential and value to the team.

Keep reading

7 Steps to Improving Resumes for Proposals That Win

No items found.

How to Help Your AEC Firm Win More Business in 2026

Technical

Best Project Management Systems for AEC Firms in 2026

No items found.