Flowcase vs. Cosential
Modern resume & proposal automation for professional services firms without the weight of a legacy CRM. If your team is fighting a clunky interface, waiting on admins to update templates, or stuck in a months-long rollout, it's time to rethink your proposal stack.
Används av över 400 företag
.svg)
A Header Goes Here
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Flowcase VS Unanet (Cosential)
.svg)
.png)
for the right people
filters (skills, markets, certifications, clients) help you instantly find the best-fit staff and projects.
Flowcase is the best Unanet (Cosential) Alternative
Dedicated Resume & Project Management
✅ Flowcase offers purpose-built tools for resume + project creation, editing, styling, tailoring, summarizing, translating, and exporting to Word/PDF/InDesign/SF330.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential): Has a resume and project library (Publisher), but template control is locked behind admins and proposal creation is clunky so teams still fall back to manual Word edits to get pursuit-ready.
Seamless data input
✅ Flowcase uses AI-powered parsing of LinkedIn, resumes, and project data to auto-populate profiles and keep information fresh across the entire firm.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential) relies on manual data entry or admin-driven syncing. Staff must keep their own profiles current, which rarely happens and project names get truncated coming from the accounting system, so they're hard to match to the right project and permissions. The result: inconsistent, outdated content
Content tailoring for proposals
✅ Flowcase enables fast, granular tailoring of bios and project summaries for each pursuit, including custom summaries, skills emphasis, and translations.
⚠️ Auto-populates templates, but pursuit-specific tailoring is limited reviewers describe proposal creation as buggy, so teams often export to Word and rewrite by hand. "It struggles to combine different types of information you end up with Frankenstein resumes."
Search & Discovery for the right people
✅ Flowcase offers advanced, structured filters (skills, markets, certifications, client history, languages) to instantly surface the best staff + projects for each RFP.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential): Has search, but filtering gaps slow teams down — for example, no easy way to exclude staff who only logged a few hours on a project, so the wrong people surface in your shortlists.
Purpose built for professional services
✅ Flowcase is designed specifically for BD, marketing, HR, and pursuit teams in AEC, consulting, and professional services, where content speed and quality directly impact win rates.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential): A heavyweight, firm-wide CRM system of record. It's powerful, but the interface is dated with a steep learning curve, and template updates are gated behind admins so day-to-day proposal teams move slower.
Exporting options to proposal ready templates
✅ Flowcase exports to branded PDFs, Word, SF330, and native InDesign files, plus custom firm templates all formatted instantly and consistently.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential): Exports to PDF, RTF, Word, and InDesign but reformatting still eats time, and only admins can upload Publisher templates, creating a bottleneck on deadline.
Control over confidential work
✅ Flowcase lets you control exactly who sees sensitive projects, client names, and descriptions so the right people access the right content, and nothing leaks into the wrong proposal.
⚠️ Unanet (Cosential): Limited customization beyond basic field types makes confidential project descriptions and client-level permissions hard to manage.