The SF330 Survival Guide for 2026
What AEC proposal teams need to know about scoring, recency, and evaluator expectations this year.
- The SF330 form hasn’t changed, how it’s being judged has
- Teams lose points in Sections E, F, H - without realizing it
- What evaluators now expect in 2026 (recency, relevance, and proof)
4.6
4.8
The SF330 Survival Guide for 2026
Brukes av over 400 konsulentselskaper
.svg)
.png)
A Header Goes Here
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
.jpg)
What this guide covers
- What’s changing in SF330 evaluations in 2026
- The 5 non-negotiable rules reviewers are enforcing
- Where teams lose points across Sections E, F, H
- Why inconsistency, outdated experience, and marketing language hurt scores
This guide is built for teams who already know the form, and want to protect their score.
Designed for Fast Moving Proposal Teams
- Proposal managers and coordinators
- Marketing leaders supporting SF330s
- AEC firms doing federal, state, or municipal work
If your team does more than three SF330s a year, this is for you.
