Your firm has the experience to win. Can it find it in time?

The State of Experience Data in Proposals 2026. Independent research by stargazy with Flowcase.

Download the report

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The proof behind winning bids at
64%
rank relevant past experience as a top-two win factor

The thing that wins is proof you've done it before

Not the writing. Relationships come second at 46%. Writing quality, where most proposal hours go, ranks near the bottom.

26%
say finding and compiling that experience is their biggest challenge

It's also the hardest part of the job

Tailoring it to the client is next at 20%. Writing and structuring the proposal: 10%. The bottleneck sits before anyone opens a document.

Proposal manager reviewing a resume in FlowcaseEngineers on site with a Flowcase project record
20pts
confidence gap between leaders (78%) and proposal teams (58%)

Leaders think it's easy. The people doing it disagree.

Same firms, same content, twenty points apart. Here's what each side sees when a bid needs proof.

What leaders see
78% confident
Ask for proof. Proof arrives. Looks easy.
What the proposal team does
58% confident
Delivered. Two days later. Logged as a success.
Replay
50%
of firms have declined to bid because they couldn't prove experience in time

The bids nobody counts

The experience existed. It just wasn't written up in a form anyone could use by the deadline. Nobody debriefs a proposal that wasn't written.

Proposal team reviewing a bid together
"Having the project on paper wasn't enough if we couldn't credibly connect our people to it. You can't hide from an SF-330 G Matrix."
Briana Carter
Briana Carter
Pursuit Team Manager, Buildings, US South, Stantec
SF330 Section G
Key personnel participation in example projects
Key person
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Project manager
Lead engineer
Architect
QA/QC lead
Provable
Can't connect in time
56%
are using or piloting AI for proposal content

AI is being pointed at content nobody trusts

56% are using or piloting AI. 46% aren't confident their data is clean enough to feed it, and half of AI users have already seen it invent proposal content.

Where does your firm sit?

The report's four levels of experience data maturity. Click a level to see what it looks like and what to fix next.

Level 1: Scattered
No agreed location. Content lives on servers, in inboxes and in people's memory.
Retrieval time
Days
AI readiness
Unsafe to automate
Fix next
Agree one place for people and project content, and name who owns it.
Level 2: Centralized
One repository, unstructured. Findable only by people who already know what exists.
Retrieval time
A day or more
AI readiness
Inputs unreliable
Fix next
Hold people and projects as linked, searchable records before any AI pilot.
Level 3: Structured
People and projects held as linked, attribute-searchable records.
Retrieval time
Hours
AI readiness
Usable with review
Fix next
Name an owner and an update schedule. Ownership is what separates Level 3 from 4.
Level 4: Governed
Structured, with a named owner, a defined update schedule and measured currency.
Retrieval time
Minutes
AI readiness
Inputs trustworthy
Fix next
Audit content age, not just completeness, and make win rate visible to the team.

Get the numbers in front of your leadership

Full findings, the maturity model and four questions to place your firm, with perspectives from Stantec, Smartegies, Haselwood Marketing and Future Growth Strategies.

Download the report